[benchmark] myfaces codi scopes - codi vs orchestra

i did a simple benchmark in order to compare codi (+ owb 1.1) and the scopes of orchestra (without persistence interceptor). as you know the results depend on a lot of parameters. anyway, the following chart should give you a basic impression about the difference. on my system i can reproduce the results (tolerance: ~0,25ms). the benchmark invokes a method of an injected bean 1000 times. the benchmark was started 3 times and the chart shows the rounded average.

the benchmarks with the direct method calls use the injected beans directly. that means those benchmarks show the raw performance. the benchmarks with the el-resolver calls use the jsf-api for resolving the beans and therefore they show the performance of the el-resolver implementations.

note:
owb has a special proxy for request scoped beans - that's the reason why there is such a huge difference.

extval r3 in action - fullstack 2010

this fullstack demo illustrates some use-cases of using jsf 1.2, spring 3, myfaces extval r3, bean-validation,... in case of myfaces extval the demo also shows how to keep all layers outside the view-layer independent of extval classes. so you see how to re-use existing (extval independent) constraints for ui validation in a typesafe way.
furthermore, the demo shows how to integrate bean-validation (jsr 303) in jsf 1.x applications.

further details are available in the (short) readme file.

here is the list of the used technologies:
- jsf 1.2 (+ facelets)
- myfaces orchestra
- myfaces extval r3 (+ some add-ons)
- bean-validation (jsr 303)
- spring 3
- jpa 1.0
- primefaces